Dimensional tolerances control feature size, while geometric tolerances control form, orientation, location, profile, and runout, often relative to defined datums. Both are needed when size alone cannot protect fit or function. A bore can meet its diameter limits yet reject a shaft because its axis is tilted or displaced from the mating pattern. Buyers should identify each functional interface, assign size limits to mating features, and add only the geometric controls needed to protect assembly. The drawing should also state the governing standard edition and the condition in which the finished part will be inspected.
Dimensional tolerances define the acceptable size variation of a feature, including length, width, diameter, thickness, depth, slot width, and step height. A 10.00 mm shaft with a plus/minus 0.02 mm size tolerance has limits of 9.98 mm and 10.02 mm. That conclusion is valid only when the drawing units, feature definition, thermal condition, and measurement method agree. ISO 1 establishes 20 degrees C as the standard reference temperature for geometrical product specifications and verification; it does not remove the need to manage part and gauge temperature. ISO 2768-1 can provide general tolerances for linear and angular dimensions without individual tolerance indications when the drawing invokes it and the selected class suits the function. Critical bearing seats, sealing diameters, fitted pins, and wall sections still need explicit limits. These principles apply across CNC machining, milling, and turning services. Machine positioning data alone cannot prove the delivered feature size. Tool wear, cutting force, heat, fixturing, material condition, deburring, and surface treatment can shift the result. Tight size limits can therefore require controlled finishing passes, stable workholding, in-process checks, and final inspection. When several tight sizes interact, precision machining service planning and multi-axis machining service access should be reviewed before quotation. The RFQ should distinguish functional sizes from reference or cosmetic dimensions and state whether acceptance uses a micrometer, bore gauge, CMM, limit gauge, or assembly test.
Geometric tolerances define how well a feature is shaped and how it relates to other features. Form controls such as flatness, straightness, circularity, and cylindricity can apply without a datum. Orientation, location, profile, and runout controls commonly use a datum reference frame to reproduce the functional setup. A flange may satisfy every linear dimension and still leak because the sealing face is not flat. A shaft may meet diameter limits and still vibrate because its journal has excessive runout from the datum axis. A correct hole diameter does not ensure assembly when the hole pattern is displaced. ASME Y14.5 supplies a common language for dimensions and tolerances, but the contract must identify the applicable edition. Concentricity can appear on legacy drawings; a current design review should confirm whether position, profile, or runout better expresses the functional requirement. Material condition modifiers also require care because bonus tolerance exists only when the selected control and feature condition permit it. The supplier should confirm that machining fixtures and inspection setups can establish the specified datums in the stated order. Inspection must then evaluate the actual callout, not substitute coordinate dimensions or a convenient shop reference. A functional gauge may efficiently verify a mating boundary, while a CMM report can show feature location and datum alignment. Neither method is automatically correct without the drawing acceptance rule.
Dimensional and geometric tolerances work together when each requirement traces to an assembly function. Consider a motor end plate machined from aluminum 6061-T6. Diameter limits control the bearing bore, flatness controls the mounting face used as datum A, perpendicularity controls the bore axis to that face, and position controls the bolt pattern from datums A, B, and C. If the bore is on size but tilted, the bearing and shaft can bind. If the holes are individually on size but incorrectly located, the plate will not assemble. A first article should establish the datum setup, measure the finished bore and face, verify the pattern by CMM or a qualified functional gauge, and confirm fit with the mating design. Other materials change the process risk without changing this logic. A manifold made from stainless steel SUS304 can distort after heavy stock removal, so port size and position should be checked after the datum faces stabilize. Components in Inconel 718 or Ti-6Al-4V may require extra attention to tool wear, residual stress, and finishing sequence. Engineering polymers such as PEEK can move after unclamping or with temperature and moisture, so the inspection condition belongs in the acceptance plan. Surface state is a separate variable. An as-machined surface finish may suit a non-contact face, while CNC part polishing services can alter edges or feature size if allowance and measurement timing are undefined. Applications in aerospace and aviation, medical device, and automotive use different acceptance evidence, so an industry label cannot replace a functional callout. A complete RFQ includes the 2D drawing, governing standard edition, datums, critical dimensions, feature control frames, material and condition, finish state, inspection temperature, mating-part information, quantity, and requested reports. During review, ask what failure a rejected feature would cause: wrong clearance, leakage, misalignment, vibration, or stack-up. That answer identifies whether size, form, orientation, location, runout, or several controls together deserve the tighter requirement.